Standards
Editorial policy
The rules that protect the usefulness, independence and traceability of our survey software reviews.
Editorial independence
Product vendors do not approve our copy, rankings or category winners before publication. Commercial relationships, if introduced, must not determine inclusion, scoring or verdicts and must be disclosed clearly where relevant.
Sources and attribution
Material feature, pricing, security and availability claims should link to a current source. We prefer official product pages and documentation. When a source is a vendor comparison page, we treat claims about competitors cautiously and seek direct confirmation.
Fair comparisons
We compare tools against the job they are designed to perform. Enterprise research depth is not scored as universally better than simplicity, and marketing automation is not presented as a substitute for statistical research capability.
AI-assisted work
Automation may help organize evidence, check consistency and create machine-readable formats. Final rankings, claims and recommendations remain subject to the same sourcing and editorial rules. Generated text is not accepted as evidence by itself.
Corrections
We correct factual errors promptly and update related machine-readable records. See Corrections for what to submit.